To start with: I am an engineer not a lawyer â€“ and this might be part of the problemâ€¦
When I started to think about the Cloud and security and thought about all the work I do with Law Enforcement and the challenges they face. Additionally, I started to think about the legal challenges we â€“ as an industry â€“ already had. Or better, the legal challenges I knew about. Our Cloud Security Challenges paper just touches a little bit on this but to me it is a big challenge (to big for an engineer ;-)?)
Let me give you an example: A case which happens often is that Law Enforcement is approaching any mail-provider with the request to access the content of a mailbox because they have a case where the suspect is expected to have mails which can be used as evidence. This is actually fairly standard and within the legal boundaries of a country straight-forward if the law enforcement officer has a court decision. Now, with international providers it gets more complicated as a case in Belgium showed: The Belgium policed asked Yahoo! to give them access to a mailbox of a person living in Belgium based on a Belgium court decision. However, this data is hosted in the United States. Pretty normal: The police then should the FBI for help, they issue the corresponding papers (together with the court) and Yahoo! would hand over the data â€“ this process is called MLAT (mutual legal assistance treaty). Belgium refused to do that as it was their position that a Belgium decision is good enough because the suspect lives in Belgium. Yahoo! now had two choices: Violate the US law by handing over the data or violate the Belgium court decision by not handing over the data â€“ a lose-lose position they were in :-(.
And the worst thing to me is that we all have just one goal: We want to get the criminals arrested â€“ this is a battle where law enforcement, policy makers and the industry are on the same side! If you want to read more: Yahoo Fined By Belgian Court For Refusing To Give Up E-Mail Account Info
And there are a lot of cases like this. Cases where the data retention policy in one country asks for data up to 12 months and another country tells you that you are not allowed to keep data for longer than 8 months because of the Data Protection law â€“ if you operate in both, what do you do?
The longer I work in this space the more complicated it gets for me and more of such challenges pop up. This morning I read the following article: A step in the right direction. Basically this blog post covers a privacy law put in place in Massachusetts which has broad impact as it is valid not only if you are located in Massachusetts but if the company owns or licenses, receives, stores, maintains, processes, or otherwise has access to personal information in connection with the provision of goods or services or in connection with employment. In other words â€“ if you â€œrun the riskâ€ of selling to somebody in Massachusetts, you are subject to this law!
As I said, the situation gets incredible complex.
Where does this lead us to? To me there are a few things which should be done:
- Governments and the industry have to work much closer together. The industry has to have the ability to show the stumbling blocks for the businesses and together – the government and the industry – have to find solutions which protects the citizensâ€™ rights, helps to grow the economy and helps to go after the criminals.
- Governments have to think globally and act locally. Todayâ€™s cybercrime environment does not allow anymore for â€œlocal onlyâ€ solutions. There needs to be a certain level of harmonization of laws across the countries and the willingness to collaboration fast. As there is not a global jurisdiction on that level, the willingness to have harmonized legislation will be key. The challenge however is that governments are re-elected locally â€“ not globallyâ€¦
- The Industry has to behave responsibly. In order to make this happen, the industry has to be seen as a partner for the government. The only way to get there â€“ in my opinion â€“ is to act responsibly. If I look at certain behaviors I see in the industry, it is sometimes too much focused on the short-term revenue, rather than a responsible behavior.
This will definitely be the basis for a better collaboration and an environment where the legal challenges (see the Yahoo! case above) do not have to be solved on the shoulders of the businesses â€œjust becauseâ€ of legal deficiencies between countries. As I said above, we all want to fight crime as it is necessary and as it is the only way to grow the Internet in the future. And this all helps us I think